From what I can gather about the report and the NRC issues is that nobody has read the Corps of Engineers own lessons learned document prepared by it Iteragency Performance Evaluation Team. The teams most stinking acusation was that the flood protect system was "a system in name only". They also ignored the strongest recommendation which is; if they ever build it again they should use a comprehensive systems approach.
The plan appears to offer an array of disjointed projects with out any systems "glue" to ensure that they do it right with real requirements of real stakeholders and the kind of resiliency needed to hold the pieces together.
What I see is a plan to build things and not a plan to protect people and their property.
Posted on Corps delivers overdue Category 5 hurricane protection study to Congress on July 01, 2010, 12:56PM
No comments:
Post a Comment